Step 1
Open the real website
Staging or production—review where users actually experience the UI.
Website review & visual QA
Collaborative review on the live site—structured, scoped, and ready to ship.
Review the web, right where it lives.
MarkQable pins feedback to real pages, keeps work inside the right project and domain, and moves discussion into threaded notes with clear resolution—so teams stop losing decisions across chat and screenshots.
No credit card requiredExtension + web appBuilt for teams shipping websites
How teams use MarkQable
From scattered feedback to a single review surface
Live page contextProject scopeThreads per note
- Pin notes on the real DOM so QA, design, and engineering are looking at the same UI state—not a cropped capture.
- Keep feedback inside the right project with domain rules that prevent cross-site mix-ups.
- Close the loop with threads + status so decisions stay next to the issue until it is resolved.
Built for teams that review real sites, not static decks
From internal launches to client approvals—MarkQable keeps feedback anchored, scoped, and accountable.
- Product & design
- QA & engineering
- Agencies & marketing
- Org-scoped projects
Trusted-by placeholder (logos ship here)
Product org
Design studio
Growth team
Agency
The problem
Scattered review breaks down under real shipping pressure
When feedback is split across tools, velocity drops and quality gets fragile. MarkQable keeps each item tied to the page, the project, and the conversation that closes it.
Feedback buried in chat
Slack threads mix ten different issues. Nobody can point to a single source of truth—or what shipped.
Screenshots without live context
Annotated images float in email and docs. They are easy to misread and painful to trace back to the real UI state.
Ownership and resolution go fuzzy
Without a per-issue thread and status, teams repeat questions, miss fixes, and reopen the same debates.
One workflow: context, thread, decision
- 1Capture on the real site with the extension so notes reference the actual DOM and URL—not a cropped image.
- 2Scope by project and domain so work stays organized across sites, clients, and environments.
- 3Discuss and resolve per note with replies under each item and open or resolved status the whole team can trust.
The workflow
A calm path from “noticed on page” to “done with proof”
MarkQable is built around the browser extension for in-context capture and the web app for organizations, projects, and the full note list—two surfaces, one system of record.
Step 2
Pin a note on the page
Drop feedback on the element you mean, with selector-based anchoring for crisp context.
Step 3
Keep it scoped to project/domain
Notes stay aligned with the right site rules—fewer cross-project mistakes.
Step 4
Discuss in a thread
Questions and decisions live under the note—not scattered across channels.
Step 5
Resolve with visibility
Move items from open to resolved so review sessions stay focused.
Comparison
Why chat and screenshots are not a review system
Slack is great for conversation. MarkQable is where website feedback becomes structured work: anchored, scoped, and resolvable.
Capability
Scattered tools
Feedback tied to the live element
No
Yes
Scoped to the right project/domain
No
Yes
Threaded discussion per issue
No
Yes
Clear open/resolved status
No
Yes
Works where review happens (the browser)
No
Yes
Illustrative framing—your toolchain may include a tracker too; MarkQable is the layer that preserves page context and closure.
Capabilities
Everything tied to the work—not to a channel name
These capabilities mirror how MarkQable is built: projects with domain rules, notes with selectors and status, replies stored per note, and a Chrome extension that surfaces it all on the page you are reviewing.
Notes on the page
Capture feedback where it belongs: on the live site, anchored to the element you mean—so everyone shares the same context.
Project and domain scope
Each project carries a primary URL, optional domains, and subdomain rules. Notes stay tied to the right site with guardrails when you drift off-domain.
Threaded discussion per note
Every note has its own reply thread. Decisions stay next to the issue instead of mixing into unrelated chat.
Open and resolved
Track what still needs work versus what is done—filterable in the extension so review sessions stay focused.
Extension plus web app
Use the Chrome extension for in-context review and the MarkQable web app to manage organizations, projects, and the full note list.
Organization structure
Work inside organizations and projects so permissions and scope stay coherent as teams grow.
How it works
Three steps to a calmer review cycle
From setup to closure—without inventing another chat channel.
- 1
Create a project and set site scope
Add your main URL and domains (including staging or client hosts). Scope keeps notes aligned with the sites you care about.
- 2
Review in the browser and place notes
Install the MarkQable extension, pick the project, and place notes on the page. Each note stores selector and page context.
- 3
Thread, decide, resolve
Discuss in the note’s reply thread, then mark items open or resolved so the team shares one clear picture of progress.
Product
Extension for capture. Web app for control.
The extension keeps you in flow on the page. The web app gives managers a structured workspace—organizations, projects, and the full note surface—without turning review into a spreadsheet.
Browser extension
In contextActive page
app.markqable.com/projects/acme
Pin a note
Select an element, write the issue, and keep the thread on that note until it is resolved.
Status
Open
Replies
3
Web app
StructureOrg
Projects
Notes
Latest notes
FilterHero headline truncation on mobileOpen
Footer legal link contrastOpen
Checkout CTA hover stateOpen
Illustrative panels—your workspace reflects your org, projects, and domains.
Who it is for
Built for teams that ship websites together
If your job involves reviewing websites with other people, MarkQable is meant to reduce noise and speed up closure.
Product teams
Ship with confidence: capture UI and copy issues on staging or production with threads that record the decision—not just the complaint.
Design & brand
Review implementation fidelity on the real site—not only in Figma—with notes pinned to components and sections.
QA & engineering
Replace vague bug reports with anchored notes, clear status, and discussion that stays with the issue through resolution.
Agencies
Give clients a structured way to comment on deliverables while you keep projects and domains separated per engagement.
Marketing teams
Coordinate launch reviews across stakeholders without losing track of what changed, what is blocked, and what is approved.
Outcomes
From feedback to shipping—without the chaos tax
MarkQable is not “another place to chat.” It is where website review becomes trackable work with outcomes you can stand behind.
Less scattered feedback
Notes stay where the UI lives—so you stop re-explaining what “that button” means.
Faster review cycles
Threads and status make it obvious what is still open, so review sessions end with clarity.
Clearer ownership
Each item has a home: a page anchor, a project, and a conversation that does not drift.
Better release confidence
Catch visual QA issues in context before they become customer-facing surprises.
Pricing
Start free. Scale when your review volume grows.
MarkQable is designed to be easy to try with a team: create an organization, add projects, and begin capturing contextual notes in minutes.
FAQ
Answers to common questions
Straightforward details for teams evaluating a website review and visual QA workflow.
What makes MarkQable different from screenshots or a bug tracker?
Screenshots lose live context; trackers often lose the exact UI state. MarkQable pins notes to the real page with anchoring, keeps discussion in a per-note thread, and uses open/resolved status so closure is visible—while still fitting alongside your existing tools.
Can we use it on staging and production?
Yes—projects are built around URLs and domain rules, so you can scope staging hosts, production domains, and additional domains your team needs.
How do projects and domains work?
A project has a primary URL plus optional domains and subdomain rules. Notes are associated with the project so feedback stays aligned with the right site and environment.
Can teams collaborate?
Yes. Notes support threaded replies under each item, and status is shared—so everyone sees the same picture of what is open versus resolved.
Do we need both the browser extension and the web app?
The extension is for in-context capture on live pages. The web app is for organization and project structure and a fuller note surface. Together they keep review structured without pulling you out of the browser when it matters.
Who is MarkQable best for?
Teams that ship websites: product, design, QA, agencies, and marketing stakeholders who need structured review without turning feedback into a pile of messages.
Get started
Ready for website reviews that stay organized?
Create your organization, add projects with domain scope, then use the MarkQable Chrome extension to capture notes in context and move feedback from chat to closure.
No credit card required · Fast setup · Extension + web app
What you will do in the first 10 minutes
- 1. Create an account and organization.
- 2. Add a project with your site scope.
- 3. Install the extension and pin your first note on a page.